Men may be the strong hunter-gathers who hold all the power in society, but if things go wrong in the bedroom, they lose all respect and become weaker than women. Think Aristophanes and “Lysistrata” in the theater of Ancient Greece, Chaucer and “The Miller’s Tale” in early England, and all the other plays and stories mocking men who, for one reason or another, cannot have sex. This theme represents the one consistent cultural truth. Society has accepted men as the dominant gender and wrapped up all the symbolism of sexual power in the right to govern. So, throughout time, men whose sexual performance has been less than stellar have been devising strategies to hide their problems. Not for them the honesty and openness of failure. Everything must be hidden away. So it was that we came to the end of the last century and a revolutionary event. The release of the little blue pill on to the market suddenly offered a way of recovering lost power. All that was required was sufficient honesty to ask a doctor for a prescription. Since this admission took place behind the locked doors of doctor-patient confidentiality, men in their millions begged for relief. Fortunately, the pills delivered. More importantly, the pills are easily hidden. One pill some thirty minutes before sexual activity is expected protects everyone’s reputation. So one quick unobtrusive swallow does a summer make.

In fact, the manufacturers were surprised by the number of men who asked for relief. The problem for so long hidden away proved to be far greater than anyone had guessed. For the manufacturer, this was the opening day for the gold mine. For men, it was the opening day of the rest of their active sexual lives. Researchers came rushing forward to start a host of new projects to investigate the causes of erectile dysfunction now that most men affected were prepared to talk about their problems. For two or three years, this new climate of honesty continued but then, to everyone’s surprise, the number of prescriptions stabilised and, in some countries, began to fall. The online pharmacies were establishing their credibility and offering a completely confidential delivery service without the need for a prescription. Now men could sit in their own homes and place an order with their privacy guaranteed. The problem went back underground and researchers found it difficult to recruit men for their latest projects.

There is good and bad in this. Viagra has proved itself a remarkably effective drug. In almost every case, this drug works the first and then every time to produce an erection when needed. For that, millions of men around the world are grateful. But for medical research, an opportunity has been lost. In the years immediately after viagra appeared, we learned so much more about the extent of the problem and its causes. Many changes have been made to the training of doctors and to the range of treatments available as a result. But with an increasing number of men buying the drug without seeking medical advice, the chance for collecting more information is reducing. If the trend continues, we will be back to the days of plausible deniability.

Well, here’s a story, sad but true, about a man whose job came under threat. Meet Greg Williams – no, not that Greg Williams who made a name for himself playing for the Washington Redskins. This is a homely guy – great husband, better dad – who makes his living in the movie business. Except you have probably never heard of him by name. But those of you who have seen one or two adult movies might have seen this good looking guy… Ah, ha! It’s sometimes hard to drag your eyes away from the young ladies in shot but, in the straight sex movies, there has to be a guy around.

Well, Greg has made his living out of his looks and physique for the last decade or so. At first, he was just an outstanding success. There he would be on a cold and draughty set with a crew of bored technicians standing around while the lighting tech fiddled with the color tinting to get just the right effect. A MILF would be huddled in a corner sipping a cup of hot cocoa. The director would get the nod. The lights were ready. So, it’s places everyone and, “Action!” Which is why Greg was such a professional always in demand from directors. He could join the gun club the moment the cocoa disappeared and the MILF smiled.

Except this work does get a little tiring. It’s a wonderful ability to be able to turn a spectacular erection on and off at will. But Greg started to lose his edge. At first, it just took him a little longer to draw his pistol. Then the pistol was not the hardest model. But help was at hand. Greg had watched all the ads for the little blue pills, never dreaming that, one day, he would need to take one. But that day came as faintly surprised eyebrows were raised around the industry. His agent whispered a warning in this ear. With some curiosity, he popped a pill with his hot cocoa and, like magic, he was back to the instantaneous responsiveness that had carried him to stardom. Even the MILF managed something more than her usual bored smile.

Although this is an extraordinary situation, the pressure on a man to perform at his best is always there. You might not have a crew standing around with lights and cameras to record every twitch and movement of your penis as it readies for action, but you still want the best out of yourself. That’s why viagra has made itself the world’s top selling brand for drugs to treat erectile dysfunction. No matter where you are, no matter how pressured the situation, you will always rise to the occasion when you feel sexually stimulated. This drug consistently helps all men of all ages to produce an erection hard enough to penetrate their partner. Just allow about thirty minutes between taking the pill and expected action and results are guaranteed. So buy viagra online and time the swallow to perfection. That way, when your partner shouts, “Action!” you can step up to the plate and hit a home run every time – sorry Greg, it’s the wrong sport but the metaphor still works, OK?

There is a terrible sexism about acne. Let’s start with a little biology. Every human being on the planet has sebaceous glands in their skin. It’s a part of the natural process which helps keep skin supple, flexible and waterproof. For reason not entirely clear, but probably connected with genetics and hormone levels, these glands can be triggered into producing too much oil. If this happens, the oil pools in the pores and traps the dead cells that would otherwise fall from the skin. Unfortunately, this is the perfect breeding ground for many of the different bacteria growing naturally on everyone’s skin. One of these bacteria causes infections and the spots. So acne should affect people equally and regardless of gender.

During the teen years, the balance between the sexes is reasonably even, but once we include the full lifespan, it affects more women than men. This unfairness would not matter except for one thing. The majority of cultures around the world have reached agreement on what “beauty” looks like. So, when you see images of people in the mass media, faces are flawless. Thanks to photoshop and other similar wonders of technology, every blemish or hint of a spot can be airbrushed away, leaving a perfectly smooth, uniform area of skin.

When the reality of people does not match the images of perfection, this causes anxiety and despair. People with any kind of facial or obvious blemish are singled out for adverse comment. The cause is put down to poor lifestyle choices and practices. People have acne because they do not wash or eat the wrong food. They are imperfect and ugly. This is wonderful news for manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. What cannot be cured with a drug (e.g. accutane), can be covered up with a heavy foundation powder. In more extreme cases, there is always cosmetic surgery, where faces and bodies can be redesigned to match these impossible images of beauty.

The world focuses on the differences from the ideal. One side of the line is successful. The other never rises above the pack. You only have to look at women in the public eye to see the pressure on them to stay young and beautiful, no matter what it costs. When it comes to acne, the hormone balance in women is affected during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy and the menopause. Using oral contraceptives can stabilise the hormone levels but, when it comes to planning a family, there is literally nothing that can be done. The one drug that more or less absolutely guarantees an end to acne cannot be taken during pregnancy. Accutane causes damage to unborn children.

Life is never fair but it tends to be more unfair on women. They are expected to conform to these unachievable standards of beauty and we then judge them harshly when they fail. Worse, the one drug that can and does represent an effective treatment for acne can be taken safely by almost every boy and man on the planet, but not by women who may conceive. How can this not be the worst case of sex discrimination of all time. For years, the manufacturers have only helped males cure acne. Women can only use this drug if they make it impossible to conceive while taking it. Women who want a family must endure acne.

Facing a car insurance fraud even in the role of a victim means that you will have to pay. Your rates will go up because of an expensive claim, but you can risk your and your loved ones’ lives too. That’s why learning about insurance fraud protection is very important, making you prepared for illegal insurance scam that may harm you.

Insurance fraud is as old as the concept of insurance itself. Back in Ancient Greece ships were sunken on purpose to receive insurance benefits from the government. Later on, insurance scam was widely spread in England and then in the United States. With the development of automobiles and car insurance respectively, fraud users have gained a very big market rich with possibilities. Many organized crime groups as well as individuals are using flaws in the sophisticated insurance system of today to use it in their own interest, making you vulnerable to their activities. However, there are certain measures you can take in order to minimize the chance of becoming an insurance fraud victim.

First of all you have to learn what insurance fraud is all about and what schemes are usually employed. And the range of schemes is very wide. It can be a set-up accident with a car intentionally stopping in front of you to cause a collision, or an entire play with many people involved to testify your fault.

Learning what are the most common types of insurance fraud is actually the best way to be protected against such things. Here are some of the most widely used schemes of fraud to be on the lookout for:

Intentional accidents: The scam car will take its place in front of the victim car in traffic and suddenly hit the brakes when there’s not way to avoid collision. This usually causes rear-end accidents, with the scam driver receiving car damage coverage money and sometimes medical cost coverage as well.

Additional damage: The scam driver leaves the accident site, whether intentional or not, and causes additional damage to the car in order to claim that it was caused during the accident and raise car insurance coverage in his or her favor.

Fake helpers: In such a scenario fraud hunters will let you into the traffic at first and then head in to make a collision with you, claiming that they didn’t let you in the first place afterwards. Another form of “help” could be directing to doctors, repair shops or lawyers that will charge you much more than in typical situation.

Because things like these can happen to anyone and in any place, it’s very important to pay attention. Be on the lookout for traffic participants who may be following you o analyzing your driving style for some time. Keep the safe distance in front of you to have room for emergency stop. In case the accident takes place, make sure to not everything, tape or shoot all the damages and record all the information regarding the other car and people in it. This information will be very helpful when dealing with your auto insurance company and can be proof of fraud if it takes place.

For most of us buying a home is the biggest investment to mike during the whole lifetime. And it seems reasonable that such an important investment needs reasonable coverage. That’s why you need home insurance.

What’s included in your homeowners insurance?

In case you finance your house purchase through a mortgage, your lender is most likely to require you buying basic homeowners insurance. The basic homeowners insurance includes coverage against the following risks:

• Theft
• Fire and lightning
• Smoke
• Frozen pipes
• Ice and snow

Basic insurance policies also usually include liability coverage for cases when someone is injured in your house. In case there are legal actions taken against you it will also pay for court fees. Basic insurance will also cover your costs in case it’s impossible to live in the house due to fire or any other accident.

What’s left out of coverage?

To learn what is not included into the coverage you should read through your policy, especially the Exclusions part. Things not covered by standard policies vary from one insurer to another, but most likely they will include damage due to earthquake, flood, nuclear accident (very useful isn’t it?), war, act of terrorism and similar. Of course, you can buy additional coverage for such events to be included into your home insurance policy. Wear and tear damage is never included into the policy because it’s considered to be maintenance, which is the owner’s sole responsibility.

How much coverage do I need?

When buying a house through mortgage loan your lender will require you to purchase minimum home insurance coverage (which is usually the purchase value of your home). However, it’s usually not the amount of coverage to meet your insurance needs. Instead, try calculating how much money it would require to rebuild your house entirely and use this amount as the base for getting the right coverage amount. Speak to your agent when completing the insurance policy to calculate the exact amount, or even run a full inspection for qualified appraisal.

Typically, liability limits are around $100,000, however it’s too little to protect your assets in case of legal action. You may opt to raise your limits up to $500,000 for an additional price. Sometimes it may be useful to get umbrella coverage, which pushes your limits beyond $1 million, however such coverage is typically offered only when you have both your auto and home insurance from the same carrier.

Money saving tips

Of course homeowners insurance can be quite costly sometimes. Especially when you have many items under additional coverage. In order to keep the coverage you need while still having reasonable rates you might want to consider raising your deductibles first. Deductibles are the amount of money you will have to pay out of your own pocket for the damage before the insurance policy kicks in. and the higher is that amount the lower will be your premium. The usual deductible within standard policies is $250. Try raising it to $500 or even $1000, and your rates will go down by up to 15%.

Another good way to make your home insurance cheaper is installing security features such as alarm or video, special locks and so on. This way you protect your assets and the insurance company is likely to give you a good discount for that.

Since God knows men were claiming they are much better drivers than women. This doesn’t mean this statement has to do anything with reality though. There was no debate around this subject but some men actually did take women’s side on the matter. They confess their wives and girlfriends are driving more carefully on the road.

So let us analyze the situation and try to point out the traffic violation circumstances and both sexes being involved. Who do you think is more likely to end up with a fine – men or women?

To clear everything up we addressed this question to the independent experts who happens to be an insurance company worker.

“Men in general have certain driving habits that could lead them to an accident on the road. Nowadays especially, when teens start driving from the early age of 16, young boys try to make a big impression while on the road. They are not careful enough. Young girls protect themselves more. Insurance companies have to be very thoughtful when quoting rates for young people of 16 to 25. They can create problems for everybody.” – the insurance company employee says.

There is a database that we actually did check upon the research. This is what it showed – in 2008 women resulted having no traffic violations against only 64% of men. The official numbers also provided for us also show that if women ever have any traffic violations on their record it is only as many as one or two, while men usually have more than 3.

Traffic STATS were making their own calculations for AAA statistics back in 2007. This is the information they came up with. It is a fact that men have a higher risk of having a fatal income during their road driving experience. According to the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the National Household Travel Survey the number of men that died on the road is significantly higher than those of women – 175,094 for men against 82.371 for women.

Traffic STATS also reports that men are generally more willing to provide risk on the road by making deliberate forbidden stunts and creating risky situations for other drivers involved in the situation.

Age really does matter most of the time for everything. When you are young – you don’t want to listen. You think you know better than anyone else around you. You want to prove people wrong by doing some things your own way. This is a very bad attitude to have while your roadway trip. Kids at the age of 16 that just got their license are more likely to die during an accident on the road than those men who are over 25. The same is for women. Young girls that are 18-22 have more road accidents than ladies over 25. It is also true that most things come with the experience.

There is also such opinion that men show much aggression while they are in charge on the road. They express it directly while women can express it indirectly if they decide to.

It is important to remember that auto insurance is not just a leaf that you can carry around in case you need it one day. Your attitude towards the car is much more important than anything. There is no guarantee that you will end up in an accident but it is better to be protected. Don’t think men need auto insurance more than women. Both do!

This February, the Department of Health and Human Resources has issued a report identifying an alarming trend for insurance companies to seek premium rate increases. This is not limited to one or two states. This is not limited to one or two percentage increases in the rates. This is all the leading insurance companies asking for the right to significantly higher premiums: in Michigan hikes of 56%, in California hikes of 39%, and so on. If this only affected small numbers of policyholders, it might have passed unnoticed. But, with millions of policyholders affected across the country, these rate increase requests have attracted the full scrutiny of the federal government. Secretary Sibelius has been leading the attack, using the requests to push the reform agenda forward.

Because of the national anger, some companies have paused. WellPoint had proposed the increases take effect from March 1. Any increases, even if approved by the states, will now be delayed until May at the earliest. This decision is partly in response to the summons of WellPoint’s chief executive officer to Washington to justify the requested increases. Insurance companies find themselves in a difficult political situation. Their management teams accept a duty to maximize profits for the benefit of the stockholders. They look around at an America seriously affected by the recession. Increasing numbers of people are unable to afford the premiums, some because of unemployment, others because of a squeeze on credit. More worrying from the insurance industry is that more healthy people are deciding not to insure at all. This means the group of people left holding policies has a higher percentage of those with existing health problems. Without more healthy people in the group paying premiums and not claiming, it becomes more expensive to insure those less healthy people who remain. It is also a verified fact that hospitals and healthcare service professionals have also been increasing their fees and charges. The pharmaceutical companies have increased the price of almost all the most commonly used drugs. The insurance industry is under pressure from both sides. As Secretary Sibelius points out, however, this is not a completely accurate picture. Every year, insurance companies are required to submit reports to all the US states in which they are licensed to sell policies. This data shows many companies actually increased the number of policyholders during 2009.

The market in health insurance plans is complicated by the political situation. Democrats and Republicans are two armies unable to agree a truce long enough for some reform to be made. As it stands, there is no immediate likelihood that medical costs will be controlled. If the costs continue to rise faster than inflation, insurers will have no choice other than increasing their premiums. If they do not, they will not have enough cash in hand to pay out on all the claims. This means, for the average person, it will become increasingly difficult to find cheap health insurance. For those with a pre-existing condition, group health insurance will be the only option but, for those plans, premiums are rising at their fastest rates. For years, it has been obvious that the healthcare industry is broken. It would be ironic if, having come this close to some meaningful reforms, we not only saw the reform bills lost in Washington, but also found every major insurer imposing massive premium increases. That really would be the final nail in the coffin.

There are so many different versions of the idiom. Try, “Expect the worst. Hope for the best.” or “Expect the worst and you’ll never be disappointed.” or “Prepare for the worst. Plan for the best.” You get the idea, particularly when it comes to dealing with your insurance company. It’s a strange reality but, no matter where you go, insurance companies always seem to have a reputation that, as a policy holder making a claim, you will end up like something the cat dragged in. The problem we all face is the profit motive. Although it would be great if every large corporation was full of the milk of human kindness, the directors and executives are driven by the desire for more wealth. They seize every opportunity to take the extra dollar for giving us less. In the case of insurance, the companies are rather like the big bad wolf that blows your house down rather than paying to repair the leaking roof. So you always have to plan on the basis you will be in for a fight if you make a claim. That means opening and keeping an up-to-date file on everything you say to the insurer about the policy and any claims you might make. The more comprehensive your records the better. If you must speak to a representative of the company, whether in the flesh or on the phone, get a name and always write a letter confirming what was said and what, if anything, was agreed. Yes, it will take up a few minutes of your time. But you should always be able to produce contemporaneous records – a day-by-day record of representations, promises and action.

You are rolling your eyes. All that hassle. Why bother? Let’s take Massachusetts as an example. Five of the largest companies insuring vehicles all managed to make the same data entry mistake. There is this wonderful “place” called the Comprehensive Loss Underwriting Exchange (CLUE). All companies pool information about the drivers they insure. One of the more important pieces of data is whether the driver is “at fault” in a traffic accident. If you are found the “guilty” party, this justifies loading your premium with an increase. What happened in this US state was the five insurers routinely recorded anyone making a claim as being “at fault”. There was no investigation, no court case with a judge deciding one party was at fault. The insurers simply wanted to justify increasing the premiums so assumed fault from the fact of the claim. Fortunately, the people of Massachusetts are well organized. They had a paper trail for every claim and, when they reported the behavior of the insurers to the State Attorney General, this resulted in fines paid by the companies and a recalculation of all the premiums with a full refund to everyone affected.

Sadly, auto insurance is a bear pit and, if you are going to come within range of the bear, you had better be prepared with full information. It does not matter whether you are on cheap auto insurance, usually the mandatory liability minimum, or a comprehensive/collision policy with all the bells and whistles, document every aspect of your relationship with the insurer and every detail of any claim you make. If anything goes wrong, every state has a Department or Office of Insurance. Make a formal complaint if you think you are losing out. If you learn of others, complain to the State Attorney General. Failure to fight means the companies will trample on your rights.

The market for insurance in the US is somewhat unusual. In most every other line of business, companies are allowed to compete with each other across state lines. This helps to keep pricing and the quality of the product to higher levels and protect the consumer. But, the insurance industry is licensed and regulated state-by-state. There’s no such thing as a federal insurance policy. You have to buy a policy written by a company licensed in the state where you live. This is frustrating because, if you live near the border, your friends and colleagues at work probably tell you how little they pay or complain you have the better deals. Either way, it’s not very fair. Worse, the companies often decide not to set up in all fifty states, but pick and choose where they will operate. The result is that many states only have a small number of licensed insurance companies. Because there is no real competition, their premium rates tend to be high. This produces a big political divide. In Republican states, this is the free market at work and no intervention is necessary. If you do not like this, move to another state which has lower rates. In Democratic states, there is more interest in protecting consumer interests. Some states have intervened in their local markets to introduce “managed competition”. Needless to say, this has outraged the insurance industry and the insurance agents who survive on the commission earned from the insurers. There have been heated debates between the lawmakers. Where the local Department or Office of Insurance has produced new rules, they have been referred to the local courts. Who would have thought helping millions of average people to save money on their premium rates would produce so much heat.

Anyway, the latest state to surface in this national debate is Massachusetts. In some ways, this state is also slightly nonstandard because of the dominance of the local agents who handle about 80% of the insurance business. Agents have more to lose if the markets are opened up to competition (and sites like this offer a direct line to insurance companies without having to go through an agent). Not surprisingly, they have been the fastest to the courts in the fight to protect their income. We have just had the decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Court on two rule changes made by the state’s Insurance Commissioner Nonnie Burnes (she has since retired to a university post). Let’s start with the effect of the move to open up the state to competition. Before the rule changes, there were nineteen insurers writing auto insurance policies. Twelve more companies have now entered the markets. In most cases, premium rates have been stable as insurers cut their costs and accepted a reduced profit. But agents have been hit because the opportunities to earn commission have been reduced.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court has supported the reforms, finding the effect of managed competition is sufficiently beneficial that it should represent the prevailing public policy in the state. Put another way, the judges think the many consumers should pay less rather than the few corporate officers and stockholders earn excessive profits. Because one of the agent’s automatic rights to a commission has disappeared, they will be looking to recover their losses in other ways. There are two morals to this story. The first is that, if you want to find cheap auto insurance, support the lawmakers in those states who promise to introduce more competition into the car insurance market. Secondly, always get your auto insurance quotes through a site like this and avoid agents who earn commission.

Let’s leave the politics of healthcare reform to one side and focus on a proposal to change the law to allow free market competition between insurers in different states. A policy consistently mentioned by the Republican party is to break the state monopolies in the insurance market. Since the 1800’s, the individual states have claimed the sole right to regulate the sale of insurance within their own borders. Each state has asserted the right to license insurance companies and to set the terms on which they can conduct business. This has led to a patchwork of different sets of regulations with each state creating unique laws. In turn, this forces an insurance company to set up separate subsidiaries to trade in each state. No licensed company can sell a policy to someone who has a residence in another state. There was a brief moment in 1944 when a decision of the Supreme Court allowed the possibility of federal supervision. But the lawmakers in Washington immediately changed the law to retain state control. Why is this a bad thing? The national insurance companies have divided up the states between them and choose not to compete against each other. This keeps the number of insurance companies in each state artificially low and, because there is no real competition, premium rates are higher than they should be for weak policy terms.

You are reading this article on the internet. When online, you can buy more or less any product or service across state or national boundaries. Although there are some restrictions, e.g. some states limit your right to import drugs from foreign countries, there is an almost free market where you can search for the cheapest price and buy whatever you need. There is no possible economic justification for retaining this historical privilege for insurance companies. All it does is preserve their ability to maximize their profits at your expense. For example, in Minnesota three insurance companies dominate 80% of the market for health plans. There is no doubt that, if more companies entered the market, the premium rates would fall. During his run for President, Senator John McCain was in favor of free markets for health plans. President Obama supports it and the proposal is in both versions of the healthcare reform bills currently stalled in Washington. But because the Republican party’s only policy is to oppose everything the Democrats propose, it seems even this simple change in the law may be lost. What will the result be? The anticompetitive behavior of the insurance industry will continue and you, the consumer, will suffer.

Could the law change tomorrow and allow everyone access to cheap health insurance wherever it can be found? The problem is that the states have different sets of regulations and compliance leads to different costs. The playing fields are not level. So, premiums are significantly lower in those states which have the fewest consumer protections. It would not be fair competition if people living in Minnesota, which has strong consumer protections, could all get health insurance quotes from states with little or no consumer protections. The only way in which there could be a free market is to have a single set of federal regulations for the sale of health insurance plans. Sadly, the political parties do not want to talk about this even though we would all benefit. In the US, the political elite’s interests do not match the needs of the ordinary citizens.